Cardiovascular Disease and its Risk Factors among Mexican Americans in Starr County, Texas
Page: 1-36
2018
- 14Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage14
- Abstract Views14
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Based on the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death in America and many other countries. Even though there are many cardiovascular related studies, research in the Hispanic population in the US has generally been limited and the impact of cardiovascular disease underestimated. Understanding the risk factors for cardiovascular disease among the Hispanic population is essential since they are the largest minority group in America and have their own unique health characteristics. To effectively and thoroughly learn about overall cardiovascular health in America, we conducted a cross-sectional study to compare the distribution of traditional risk factors of cardiovascular disease among Mexican Americans divided by gender and diabetes status to determine the contribution of potential risk factors to cardiovascular disease risk. These studies build on previous studies among Mexican Americans in Starr County, Texas. This study made use of data collected in the “Starr County Health Studies”. In these data, we selected 138 individuals with cardiovascular disease and 1,043 individuals without cardiovascular diseases and analyzed the present of cardiovascular disease based on EKGs, history of myocardial infarction, history of cardiovascular-related surgery, and echocardiography. In additional, risk factors were compared between those who have heart disease and those who do not. These were compared to other Latino population studies. For the statistical analysis, univariate descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used throughout the study after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and diabetes status. The study population were divided into 8 different groups by gender, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes status. Overall, about half of the study population had stage 1 or higher blood pressure category and 90% of them were either overweight or obese. Within the traditional risk factors, only age and body mass index were significant (p value>0.05). For the potential risk factors, taking lipid lowering medication, hypertensive status, and left ventricular mass were statistically significant (p value>0.05). The contribution of risk factors and potential risk factors were identified by stratification of diabetes. Since those with diabetes had higher risk of cardiovascular disease, obesity, lipid lowering medication, and hypertension than non-diabetics, more diagnostic testing with a proper treatment should be recommended for those with diabetes.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know