Machine Learning Modeling of Protein-intrinsic Features Predicts Tractability of Targeted Protein Degradation
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, ISSN: 1672-0229, Vol: 20, Issue: 5, Page: 882-898
2022
- 17Citations
- 9Usage
- 75Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef8
- Usage9
- Downloads8
- Abstract Views1
- Captures75
- Readers75
- 75
Article Description
Targeted protein degradation (TPD) has rapidly emerged as a therapeutic modality to eliminate previously undruggable proteins by repurposing the cell’s endogenous protein degradation machinery. However, the susceptibility of proteins for targeting by TPD approaches, termed “ degradability ”, is largely unknown. Here, we developed a machine learning model, model-free analysis of protein degradability (MAPD), to predict degradability from features intrinsic to protein targets. MAPD shows accurate performance in predicting kinases that are degradable by TPD compounds [with an area under the precision–recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.759 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.775] and is likely generalizable to independent non-kinase proteins. We found five features with statistical significance to achieve optimal prediction, with ubiquitination potential being the most predictive. By structural modeling, we found that E2-accessible ubiquitination sites, but not lysine residues in general, are particularly associated with kinase degradability. Finally, we extended MAPD predictions to the entire proteome to find 964 disease-causing proteins (including proteins encoded by 278 cancer genes) that may be tractable to TPD drug development.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672022922001498; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.11.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85146362947&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494034; https://academic.oup.com/gpb/article/20/5/882/7230461; https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/uthgsbs_docs/971; https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1948&context=uthgsbs_docs; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7413378&internal_id=7413378&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.11.008
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know