I'll Be Back for You: Exploring Duality and Negation through Time Travel
2014
- 24Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage24
- Abstract Views19
- Downloads5
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Novels about and for women are often maligned by the reading public. Referred to as “chick lit” or other unflattering terms, these books are often published and treated in ways distinct from their male counterparts because of assumptions about feminine authorship and “femalehood” as a differentiation from the norm: novels about men, then, are “universal” and novels about women are “niche” or “genre.” Similar trends can be seen in the way writing for young people, who are often considered an unsophisticated audience in ways that parallel closely with perceptions of women-as-audience. Increasingly, however, women and young people are the people who still read books.This thesis is part of an ongoing effort on the author's part to disrupt this shared assumption about the seriousness of women and young people by writing books about and for young women and “young adults” that take them seriously as an audience. It embodies many elements of the “young adult novel” canon such as fantastic happenings (time travel, ambiguously magical events), but retains features of serious novels and contains an accompanying critical introduction that describes the research into the way structural inequality impacts which texts are “literary” and which are “genre.”
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know