Development of Theory of Mind from Ages Four to Eight
2009
- 1,544Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,544
- Downloads1,343
- 1,343
- Abstract Views201
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The study comprised two experiments that engaged one hundred eighteen children, divided into three age groups (4-, 6-, & 8-year-olds) in competitive games with an adult designed to explore advances in children’s theory of mind (TOM) beyond false-belief mastery. The game paradigms were designed so that children with an understanding of RAI (the understanding that a social partner may be observing one’s behavior to gain insight into one’s intentions and that one can observe the partner’s behavior to gain similar insight – a proposed later development of TOM) would be more effective competitors than children who lacked such awareness. It was hypothesized that the skills required to successfully complete these games are not present in the average preschooler, but show significant development from ages 4 to 8. Success in Experiment 1 required children to inhibit information or provide misinformation. Such abilities are considered in deception studies to be indicative of a recursive awareness of intentionality. Age trends were evident for all dependent variables, including success at the task, strategic behaviors, and interview data. Four-year-olds were non-strategic and rarely successful, six-year-olds showed increased flexibility in their strategic behavior and were more successful, and eight-year-olds were significantly more flexible and subtle in their strategies, more successful at the task, and more likely to verbalize a recursive awareness of intention than the younger age groups. Success in Experiment 2 required children use the behavioral cues of their opponent to guide their choices during the game. Such ability indicates awareness of the informative potential of nonverbal signals to infer the hidden intentions of a partner. Age trends emerged in children’s ability to detect signals that reveal information about their partner’s intentions. Eight-year-olds demonstrated significantly more awareness of the informative value of behavioral cues given by social partners than 4- and 6-year-olds and were significantly more successful at the task. Findings from both experiments suggest that there are aspects of TOM that continue to develop across middle childhood.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know