Optimizing map labeling of point features based on an onion peeling approach
Journal of Spatial Information Science, ISSN: 1948-660X, Vol: 2, Issue: 2011, Page: 3-28
2011
- 10Citations
- 202Usage
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef1
- Usage202
- Downloads183
- Abstract Views19
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
Map labeling of point features is the problemof placing text labels to corresponding point features on a map in a way that minimizes overlaps while satisfying basic rules for the quality. This is a critical problem in the application of cartography and geographical information systems (GIS). In this paper we study the fundamental issues related to map labeling of point features and develop a new genetic algorithm to solve this problem. We adopt a method called convex onion peeling and utilize it in our proposed convex onion peeling genetic algorithm (COPGA) to efficiently manage map labels of point features. The proposed algorithm takes advantage of a convex onion peeling structure to achieve better map label initialization and to enhance the evolutionary process. The performance of the proposed algorithm was evaluated through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real datasets. In experiments with an implementation of our algorithm using OpenMap, the results show that our genetic algorithm, based on convex onion peeling, is an efficient, robust, and extensible algorithm for automated map labeling of point features.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887315938&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.5311/josis.2011.2.4; https://josis.org/index.php/josis/article/view/10; https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/josis/vol2011/iss2/2; https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=josis; https://dx.doi.org/10.5311/josis.2011.2.4
Journal of Spatial Information Science
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know