Balancing Offshore Wind Development with Wildlife and Habitat Conservation in the Gulf of Maine
Maine Policy Review, Vol: 32, Issue: 2, Page: 126-128
2023
- 224Usage
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage224
- Downloads136
- Abstract Views88
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
The potential for offshore wind energy development using floating technology in the Gulf of Maine is enormous. Development in the Gulf of Maine – which boasts some of the highest sustained wind speeds in the world that peak in the winter when Maine’s energy needs are the greatest – stands to play a big part in solving our climate puzzle. However, this opportunity must be considered alongside the known and potential negative impacts to Gulf wildlife, fish, and marine habitats. Maine Audubon biologists and policy experts are confident that with meaningful investments in research and monitoring, adaptive management, and the adoption of state and federal policy tools, the benefits to wildlife from offshore wind development outweigh the risks. Climate change is the greatest threat to wildlife in Maine and we must thoughtfully embrace technologies that will lessen that threat.
Bibliographic Details
Margaret Chase Smith Policy Center, University of Maine
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know