Multi-Age Instruction: An Effective Learning Environment or Simply a Cost-Effective Endeavor?
2019
- 136Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage136
- Abstract Views136
Artifact Description
Budget cuts and teacher shortages are plaguing our school systems and school administrators are attempting to use whatever means necessary to help combat this current predicament. One trend that is on the rise is the reinstallation of multi-age classroom environments. This is a learning innovation that can be traced back to the times of one-room schoolhouses. In that era, one-room schools were born out of necessity; communities did not have the budget nor the resources to run a school like we know today. With this recent push to revert to this type of learning environment, the question must be asked: Are we returning to this type of classroom setting because of the current teacher and budget shortages or is there solid evidence grounded in respected research that proves this setting to be beneficial to our students? Compared to a traditional or single-age classroom, does the multi-age setting increase academic achievement, specifically in math and literacy, as well as a student’s socio-emotional skills? Could multi-age classrooms be the solution that we are looking for that not only helps keep costs lower but also provides an optimal learning environment?
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know