A Theoretical Study of Feasibility of Alternating Engine
2012
- 103Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage103
- Downloads90
- Abstract Views13
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study is an evaluation of a new idea of an engine "Alternating Engine" which should have lower mechanical losses, less vibration, higher mechanical efficiency and more torque than the conventional reciprocating engine. The name of Alternating engine came from the alternating parts "pistons" in a circle instead of reciprocating parts as in conventional engine. The Alternating engine has lower mechanical losses due to no inertia forces of the reciprocating parts as in the conventional engine that include pistons and connecting rods during a complete combustion cycle. Less vibration is due to a complete balance for the alternating parts. Higher torque at very low RPM is due to longer torque arm than the conventional crank shaft torque arm. The thermodynamic analysis in this study used an ideal gas model (air) for the working fluid. Sealing the sliding surfaces and parts remains a significant challenge but is not as challenging if compared to the Wankel engine.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know