Uniform energy decay rates of hyperbolic equations with nonlinear boundary and interior dissipation
Control and Cybernetics, Vol: 37, Issue: 4, Page: 935-969
2008
- 1Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
Article Description
We consider the problem of uniform stabilization of nonlinear hyperbolic equations, epitomized by the following three canonical dynamics: (1) the wave equation in the natural state space L2(ω) x H-1 (ω), under nonlinear (and non-local) boundary dissipation in the Dirichlet B.C., as well as nonlinear internal damping; (2) a corresponding Kirchhoff equation in the natural state space [H2(ω) H01(ω)] x H10(ω), under nonlinear boundary dissipation in the "moment" B.C. as well as nonlinear internal damping; (3) the system of dynamic elasticity corresponding to (1). All three dynamics possess a strong, hard-to-show "boundary → boundary" regularity property, which was proved, also by invoking a micro-local argument, in Lasiecka and Triggiani (2004, 2008). This is by no means a general property of hyperbolic or hyperbolic-like dynamics (Lasiecka and Triggiani, 2003, 2008). The present paper, as a continuation of Lasiecka and Triggiani (2008), seeks to take advantage of this strong regularity property in the case of those PDE dynamics where it holds true. Thus, under the above boundary → boundary regularity, as well as exact controllability of the corresponding linear model, uniform stabilization of nonlinear models is obtained under minimal nonlinear assumptions, provided that a corresponding unique continuation property holds true. The treatment of the present paper is cast in the abstract setting (Lasiecka, 1989, 2001; Lasiecka and Triggiani, 2000, Ch. 7, 2003, 2008), which is proper for these hyperbolic dynamics and recovers the results of Lasiecka and Triggiani (2003, 2008) in the absence of the nonlinear interior damping, in particular in the linear case.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know