Alternate Facts as Ultimate Reality
2022
- 267Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage267
- Abstract Views192
- Downloads73
- Plays2
Artifact Description
We live in an age of conspiracy theories. Big companies, the media, the medical community, governments, and global elites stand accused of attempting to deceive the public by spreading fake information and manipulating technologies. Both online and offline, these theories are often supported by American Christian evangelicals, but why? The Department of Religion at Montclair State University invites you to explore this question and the implications of the answers in our third of three installments of the series Angry Religion: The Rise of American Theocracy — “Alternate Facts as Ultimate Reality” — a panel that discusses the intersections of conflicting worldviews, beliefs of interconnectivity, and disbeliefs in science/technology.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know