Channel integration and profit sharing in the dynamics of multi-channel firms
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, ISSN: 0969-6989, Vol: 17, Issue: 5, Page: 430-440
2010
- 66Citations
- 3Usage
- 149Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations66
- Citation Indexes66
- 66
- CrossRef44
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
- Captures149
- Readers149
- 149
Article Description
With the rapid development of e-commerce, many brick and mortar firms are increasingly creating e-commerce channels that operate quite independently from existing physical channels, which lead to intensive channel conflicts. Channel integration with profit sharing can effectively eliminate channel conflicts and improve channel coordination for these multi-channel firms. In this study, we focus on the strategic role played by channel integration with profit sharing in the online-traditional channel competition. We use a game theoretic approach to investigate this issue. We compare non-integrated channel profits with integrated channel profits to show that both the online and traditional channels always benefit from a channel integration strategy by capturing some portion of the incremental profit gains generated by an integrated channel. We utilize a profit bargaining model to implement profit sharing for the online and traditional channels to achieve their channel integration. Based on our results, optimal marketing strategies are derived.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698910000494; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.04.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77955174992&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0969698910000494; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0969698910000494?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0969698910000494?httpAccept=text/plain; https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/infomgmt-busanalytics-facpubs/48; https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=infomgmt-busanalytics-facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.04.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know