Attaining Certainty: A Rhetorical Analysis of Yaqeen Curriculum Artifacts
2024
- 16Usage
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage16
- Abstract Views16
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Artifact Description
Introduction: This research project will offer a rhetorical analysis of Yaqeen Institute, a traditional Muslim research organization in the United States, uses to attract Muslims to Islam and shape their views of themselves and the ideas they engage with. In what ways might Yaqeen Institute shape Muslim identity? What ideas are introduced to Muslims by Yaqeen, how are they introduced, and why? How might ideas translate into lived practices, organizing efforts, or other initiatives that impact how people live? Drawing on rhetorical analysis of Yaqeen Institute artifacts, I will argue that young Muslims resort to Yaqeen Institute to confront and rid themselves of doubt in exchange for certainty. During or after this process of dismantling doubt, Yaqeen introduces young Muslims to ideologies considered external to Islam. They are also introduced to select Islamic thought and scholarship. Yaqeen uses rhetoric to engineer negative reactions to philosophies/ideologies that are not deemed Islamic by the organization. Islamic thought is positioned as a solution to ideologies, and Yaqeen grounds Muslims in a selective Islamic worldview as an alternative to ideologies that become perceived by Muslims as contrasting. The result is Muslims going from doubtful to being grounded in some Islamic thought and language that they use to contrast themselves with other ideologies. Methods: Burke's Language as Symbolic Action, Aristotle's Rhetoric, and Lyons's There’s No Translation for It: The Rhetorical Sovereignty of Indigenous Languages will be used to analyze Yaqeen Institute artifacts. Results: The results of this research will be available on April 19th, 2024.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know