Disturbances in North American boreal forest and Arctic tundra: impacts, interactions, and responses
Environmental Research Letters, ISSN: 1748-9326, Vol: 17, Issue: 11
2022
- 35Citations
- 121Usage
- 78Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations35
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef22
- Usage121
- Downloads109
- Abstract Views12
- Captures78
- Readers78
- 78
Review Description
Ecosystems in the North American Arctic-Boreal Zone (ABZ) experience a diverse set of disturbances associated with wildfire, permafrost dynamics, geomorphic processes, insect outbreaks and pathogens, extreme weather events, and human activity. Climate warming in the ABZ is occurring at over twice the rate of the global average, and as a result the extent, frequency, and severity of these disturbances are increasing rapidly. Disturbances in the ABZ span a wide gradient of spatiotemporal scales and have varying impacts on ecosystem properties and function. However, many ABZ disturbances are relatively understudied and have different sensitivities to climate and trajectories of recovery, resulting in considerable uncertainty in the impacts of climate warming and human land use on ABZ vegetation dynamics and in the interactions between disturbance types. Here we review the current knowledge of ABZ disturbances and their precursors, ecosystem impacts, temporal frequencies, spatial extents, and severity. We also summarize current knowledge of interactions and feedbacks among ABZ disturbances and characterize typical trajectories of vegetation loss and recovery in response to ecosystem disturbance using satellite time-series. We conclude with a summary of critical data and knowledge gaps and identify priorities for future study.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141067850&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac98d7; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac98d7; https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/gees-research/798; https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1797&context=gees-research; https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/16590; https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=35889&context=michigantech-p; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac98d7; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=105ec60f-534a-4036-afb2-448fe4106492&ssb=24759202042&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1748-9326%2Fac98d7&ssi=70a37f52-8427-4dc9-a687-c75a98f7ae09&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=823850511344416299761698287367636&ssn=0961b52db3d26ed9d07346454e8cc32e7cf417c5ab98-6cb9-4002-91ef9b&sso=f567c673-5afc0bb052474d9d2fd679ef6040b36262ce181e510187ec&ssp=61729292721718050649171816703518645&ssq=25257052617506556190399480083691913462721&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAwZDMzMWM4YS1iODM3LTQ4MzEtYjhjNy01MGVmOGE2YTAyMjMxNzE4MDk5NDgwNzkxMjY2OTQyMzAtNzM1NTQ1OWFhNDExMzQxMDk3NiIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDAwMzkxMjc0Ny01NzFjLTRhMTEtYjUzZS00YWNmNDcwOWM2Y2IxLTE3MTgwOTk0ODA3OTEyNjY5NDIzMC1hYTAzYzAzNjA3OTM4MTM3OTc2In0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know