Image analysis of aggregate, mastic and air void phases for asphalt mixture
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol: 13, Issue: 2, Page: 1-9
2013
- 5Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage5
- Abstract Views5
Article Description
The shape characterization and spatial distribution of aggregate,mastic and air void phases for asphalt mixture were analyzed.Three air void percentage asphalt mixtures,4%,7% and 8%,respectively,were cut into cross sections and polished.X-ray scanning microscope was used to capture aggregate,mastic,air void phase by the image.The average of polygon diameter was chosen as a threshold to determine which aggregates would be retained on a given sieve.The aggregate morphological image from scanned image was utilized by digital processing method to calculate the gradation of aggregate and simulate the real gradation.Analysis result shows that the air void of asphalt mixture has influence on the correlation between calculation gradation and actual gradation.When comparing 4.75 mm sieve size of 4%,7% and 8 % air void asphalt mixtures,7% air void asphalt mixture has 55% higher than actual size gradation,8% air void asphalt mixture has 8% higher than actual size gradation,and 4% air void asphalt mixture has 3.71% lower than actual size gradation.4% air void asphalt mixture has the best correlation between calculation graduation and actual graduation comparing to other specimens.The air void percentage of asphalt mixture has no obvious influence on the air void orientation,and three asphalt mixtures show the similar air orientation samee direction along theThe air void percentage of asphalt mixture has no obvious influence on the air void orientation, and three asphalt mixtures show the similar air orientation along the same direction.The air void percentage of asphalt mixture has no obvious influence on the air void orientation, and three asphalt mixtures show the similar air orientation along the same direction.
Bibliographic Details
https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/16635; https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=35930&context=michigantech-p; http://dx.doi.org/10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2013.02.001; https://dx.doi.org/10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2013.02.001; https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2013.02.001
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know