Binders for heap leaching agglomeration
Minerals and Metallurgical Processing, ISSN: 0747-9182, Vol: 26, Issue: 1, Page: 1-24
2009
- 34Citations
- 57Usage
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations34
- Citation Indexes34
- 34
- Usage57
- Abstract Views57
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Agglomeration techniques are widely used by industry to form fine particles into larger masses that are easier to handle and process. One area where agglomeration is potentially useful is in heap leaching operations. Without agglomeration, fine particles travel through the heap, clogging the spaces between the larger particles and resulting in poor leach solution flow. Poor flow of leach solution will result in long leach rates and/or decreased metal recovery. Agglomeration immobilizes the fine particles and therefore improves heap permeability to fluid flow. Additional additives (binders) are needed to prevent agglomerates from breaking up as leaching solution percolates through the heap. Type II Portland cement and lime are two well-known binders used in gold and silver leaching, but these are limited to alkaline leaching environments. Various other products have been tested as binders, including polymers. This paper summarizes the benefits of agglomeration in heap leaching and the results obtained from the testing of several different agglomeration binders in heap leaching operations. Copyright 2009, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70449561524&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03403413; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03403413; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03403413.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03403413/fulltext.html; https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/4616; https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=23918&context=michigantech-p; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03403413; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03403413
Springer Nature America, Inc
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know