A Chance to Read: A Solution to Reading Fluency Problems
2018
- 21Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage21
- Abstract Views21
Artifact Description
Every day, millions of children go to school just to sit in their chairs overwhelmed with a sense of confusion. These are the children who suffer from dyslexia. An official definition for this disorder has not yet been given because there is believed to be many different types of dyslexia. However, it has been shown that this disorder revolves around brain abnormalities. This research focuses of dyslexia and reading fluency. Schools participating in the study identified students whose reading fluency was below grade level. Identified students were examined to determine if the RAD Prism could provide positive intervention. The effect of RAD Prisms on reading fluency is the main focus of this project. A new assistive device, created in Kentucky, the RAD Prism has been used by over 1300 people, who claim significant improvement in reading fluency. The quantitative study was designed to determine if the RAD Prism is an effective assistive device for struggling readers. Students participating in the study were fitted and provided with a RAD Prism. Students were asked to wear them during reading instruction. After several months after receiving thread prism, pre and post study data will be evaluated to measure and document improvement in reading fluency that may occur during the study. The results will be analyzed and used to attract new participants and gain a deeper understanding of this facet of dyslexia and the possible relief of one of its damaging aspects.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know