Discrimination and LGBT Political Participation: A Complex Landscape
2024
- 28Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage28
- Abstract Views28
Poster Description
Increased visibility and legal victories have ignited interest in how discrimination influences LGBT political participation. This analysis examines current literature, revealing a complex picture with multiple theoretical perspectives. Social identity theory posits that discrimination can strengthen in-group ties and a sense of linked fate, potentially increasing participation. Conversely, minority stress theory suggests discrimination leads to internalized negativity and health issues, hindering participation. Intersectionality theory highlights how individuals with multiple marginalized identities experience discrimination uniquely, potentially decreasing participation. This research argues that political opportunities play a crucial role in shaping how discrimination influences participation. Open political environments may fuel activism in response to discrimination, while restrictive environments can worsen its negative effects. This analysis has real-world implications for empowering the LGBT community and promoting a more inclusive political system. By understanding how discrimination and political opportunities interact, we can better support the political engagement of marginalized groups.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know