Shading the truth: The patterning of adolescents' decisions to avoid issues, disclose, or lie to parents
Journal of Adolescence, ISSN: 0140-1971, Vol: 33, Issue: 2, Page: 285-296
2010
- 71Citations
- 2Usage
- 102Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations71
- Citation Indexes70
- 70
- CrossRef52
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures102
- Readers102
- 102
Article Description
Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to examine the patterning of adolescents' strategy choice when discussing issues with parents in a sample of 1678 Chilean 11–19 year olds (mean age = 14.9). Adolescents reported whether they fully disclosed, partially disclosed, avoided the issue, or lied for six core areas that bridged personal autonomy and safety concerns. Five patterns were identified: two in which adolescents were likely to either share information about all issues or lie about them and three in which adolescents used a combination of strategies that included sharing some information while concealing other. Membership in the full disclosure class was highest among middle class youth and those who reported the highest obedience, legitimacy beliefs, parental agreement, maternal warmth and knowledge, and the fewest problem behaviors. Interestingly, adolescents in the Lie class reported both the highest level of parental monitoring and low maternal knowledge.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140197109001316; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77649189290&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19926123; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.008; https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/faculty_schol/2505; https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3504&context=faculty_schol; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.008
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know