Cooperative Breeding and Long-Distance Dispersal: A Test Using Vagrant Records
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, Page: e58624
2013
- 10Citations
- 83Usage
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef5
- Usage83
- Downloads77
- Abstract Views6
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Cooperative breeding is generally associated with increased philopatry and sedentariness, presumably because short-distance dispersal facilitates the maintenance of kin groups. There are, however, few data on long-distance dispersal in cooperative breeders-the variable likely to be important for genetic diversification and speciation. We tested the hypothesis that cooperative breeders are less likely to engage in long-distance dispersal events by comparing records of vagrants outside their normal geographic range for matched pairs (cooperatively vs. non-cooperatively breeding) of North American species of birds. Results failed to support the hypothesis of reduced long-distance dispersal among cooperative breeders. Thus, our results counter the conclusion that the lower rate of speciation among cooperative breeding taxa found in recent analyses is a consequence of reduced vagility. © 2013 Rusk et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0058624; 10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84875016370&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23516519; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g002; https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_fac_pubs/149; https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1170&context=biology_fac_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058624; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058624&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058624&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058624; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058624; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058624.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know