PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Regime Type and COVID-19 Response

FIIB Business Review, ISSN: 2455-2658, Vol: 9, Issue: 3, Page: 152-160
2020
  • 98
    Citations
  • 220
    Usage
  • 137
    Captures
  • 10
    Mentions
  • 97
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    98
    • Citation Indexes
      94
    • Policy Citations
      4
      • Policy Citation
        4
  • Usage
    220
  • Captures
    137
  • Mentions
    10
    • News Mentions
      9
      • News
        9
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • Blog
        1
  • Social Media
    97
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      97
      • Facebook
        97

Most Recent News

Did government type have an effect on restrictive COVID-19 measures?

It’s been over a year since the first outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, we have seen co u ntries dealing with the pandemic

Article Description

From late 2019 to the first half of 2020, the world has witnessed the epic spread and destruction of the novel coronavirus which was discovered in Wuhan, China. The huge number of infections and deaths caused by the virus, the collapse of the healthcare system and the economic consequences have few modern equivalents. While governments of all countries are responding to the pandemic, a heated debate rages about which political system, democracy versus authoritarian, is better positioned to respond to the pandemic. While the worldwide effort to contain the virus continues, we offer a preliminary comparison between democracies and authoritarian regimes in their responses to COVID-19, and policy suggestions for democracies to improve their governance and their ability to respond to crises.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know