Regime Type and COVID-19 Response
FIIB Business Review, ISSN: 2455-2658, Vol: 9, Issue: 3, Page: 152-160
2020
- 98Citations
- 220Usage
- 137Captures
- 10Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations98
- Citation Indexes94
- 94
- CrossRef81
- Policy Citations4
- Policy Citation4
- Usage220
- Downloads112
- Abstract Views108
- Captures137
- Readers137
- 137
- Mentions10
- News Mentions9
- News9
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent News
Did government type have an effect on restrictive COVID-19 measures?
It’s been over a year since the first outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, we have seen co u ntries dealing with the pandemic
Article Description
From late 2019 to the first half of 2020, the world has witnessed the epic spread and destruction of the novel coronavirus which was discovered in Wuhan, China. The huge number of infections and deaths caused by the virus, the collapse of the healthcare system and the economic consequences have few modern equivalents. While governments of all countries are responding to the pandemic, a heated debate rages about which political system, democracy versus authoritarian, is better positioned to respond to the pandemic. While the worldwide effort to contain the virus continues, we offer a preliminary comparison between democracies and authoritarian regimes in their responses to COVID-19, and policy suggestions for democracies to improve their governance and their ability to respond to crises.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105727317&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2319714520928884; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2319714520928884; https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/management_fac_pubs/49; https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=management_fac_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2319714520928884
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know