The Barrier that Deters the Geriatric Population from Receiving Quality Healthcare
2019
- 373Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage373
- Downloads256
- Abstract Views117
Artifact Description
Purpose : This literature analysis aims to understand the tangible and intangible barriers that impact the growing geriatric population in preventing from receiving quality healthcareMethods: This literature review allowed for the investigation of the various types of barriers when the American geriatric population tries to access high-quality healthcare. Different types of settings were considered; however, there was a focus on Philadelphia. The analysis allowed for the creation of possible associations and solutions for this issue. Additional articles about the most significant barriers were searched based on an original article by Horton and Johnson (2010).Results: Cost seems to be one of the important, tangible aspects in regards to the lack of access and quality of care (Fitzpatrick et al. 2004). The highest percentage of all health spending consisted of the elderly population. As of 2016, there were 7,000 practicing geriatricians in the United States (Hafner 2016). There is a positive relationship between health literacy, of the geriatric population, and perception of social standing (Fernandez et al. 2016). Approximately 20% of elderly patients belonged to the dislike subgroup--making going to the doctor the most cited reason for delaying care (Sun and Smith 2017).Conclusion: Medical professionals, public health officials, and policymakers must address the negative aging stereotypes and delay of health care delay amongst the geriatric population. Once the negative stigma of aging is gone, then additional programs and resources can be developed to assist the elderly population. Recently there has been a shift towards patient/person-centered care--focusing on “personal choice and autonomy for people receiving health services” (Kogan, A. C., Wilber, K., & Mosqueda, L. 2016).
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know