Reliability of measurement of glenohumeral internal rotation, external rotation, and total arc of motion in 3 test positions
Journal of Athletic Training, ISSN: 1938-162X, Vol: 49, Issue: 5, Page: 640-646
2014
- 16Citations
- 13Usage
- 116Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef10
- Usage13
- Abstract Views13
- Captures116
- Readers116
- 116
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Reliability of measurement of glenohumeral internal rotation, external rotation, and total arc of motion in 3 test positions
Athletes who participate in throwing and racket sports consistently demonstrate adaptive changes in glenohumeral-joint (GHJ) internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) in the dominant
Article Description
Context: Athletes who participate in throwing and racket sports consistently demonstrate adaptive changes in glenohumeral-joint internal and external rotation in the dominant arm. Measurements of these motions have demonstrated excellent intrarater and poor interrater reliability. Objective: To determine intrarater reliability, interrater reliability, and standard error of measurement for shoulder internal rotation, external rotation, and total arc of motion using an inclinometer in 3 testing procedures in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I baseball and softball athletes. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Athletic department. Patients or Other Participants: Thirty-eight players participated in the study. Shoulder internal rotation, external rotation, and total arc of motion were measured by 2 investigators in 3 test positions. The standard supine position was compared with a side-lying test position, as well as a supine test position without examiner overpressure. Results: Excellent intrarater reliability was noted for all 3 test positions and ranges of motion, with intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.93 to 0.99. Results for interrater reliability were less favorable. Reliability for internal rotation was highest in the side-lying position (0.68) and reliability for external rotation and total arc was highest in the supine-without-overpressure position (0.774 and 0.713, respectively). The supine-with-overpressure position yielded the lowest interrater reliability results in all positions. The side-lying position had the most consistent results, with very little variation among intraclass correlation coefficient values for the various test positions. Conclusions: The results of our study clearly indicate that the side-lying test procedure is of equal or greater value than the traditional supine-with-overpressure method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908116177&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.31; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25188316; https://meridian.allenpress.com/jat/article/49/5/640/112444/Reliability-of-Measurement-of-Glenohumeral; https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/pthms_ptfac/37; https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=pthms_ptfac; https://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.31; http://natajournals.org/doi/abs/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.31; http://natajournals.org/doi/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.31; https://meridian.allenpress.com/jat/article-pdf/49/5/640/1456405/1062-6050-49_3_31.pdf
Journal of Athletic Training/NATA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know