Singular Points and an Upper Bound of Medians in Upper Semimodular Lattices
Order, Vol: 17, Page: 287-299
2000
- 1Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
Article Description
Given a metric space (X, d) and a k-tuple (profile) P = (x1, x2,...,xk ) of elements of P X, a median is an element m of X minimizing the remoteness r(m) = i d(m, xi). In a special case that X is a finite upper semimodular lattice, Leclerc proved [9] that a lower bound of the medians is c(P ), the majority rule. By duality, an upper bound of the medians is c0 (P ), the dual majority rule, if X is a lower semimodular lattice. Both c(P ) and c0 (P ) will be defined in Section 2. These imply that in a finite modular lattice, the upper and the lower bounds of the medians will be c0 (P ) and c(P ), respectively. In the same paper, Leclerc pointed out an open problem: what is an upper bound for the medians in an upper semimodular lattice? Is c1(P ) (= W i xi) the upper bound of the medians? This paper shows that the upper bound is not c1(P ) by some examples (in Section 3) and gives the best possible upper bound (in Section 4).
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know