The“New” Western History Stillborn
Historian, ISSN: 1540-6563, Vol: 57, Issue: 1, Page: 201-208
1994
- 5Citations
- 56Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef2
- Usage56
- Abstract Views56
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Focuses on the author's belief that the new social history is dying and that its belated offshoot, the `new' western history was stillborn. Alienation of readers as a result of the abstruse prose style used by social historians; Failure of the 1970s generation to produce narrative syntheses that the educated public can read and understand; Emphasis on the environment; Work of Progressive frontier historians.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979406260&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1994.tb01341.x; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1994.tb01341.x; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1994.tb01341.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6563.1994.tb01341.x; https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ias_pub/66; https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1065&context=ias_pub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1994.tb01341.x; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1994.tb01341.x
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know