The Beliefs of Administrators: What Makes Professional Development Effective?
2012
- 12Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage12
- Abstract Views12
Thesis / Dissertation Description
With the passing of legislation like the No Child Left Behind Act (2002) and an increased focus on continuous improvement in public education, professional development has progressed from a passive form of learning for educators to a process in which educators are interacting, collaborating, and learning through various methods. This study utilized a mixed methods approach employing primarily a qualitative focus using phenomenological research procedures. The purpose of this study was to uncover what practices administrators believe to be effective when instituting professional development on their campus. Additionally, the researcher also measured the level at which the participating administrators believed their current practices were when aligned to the National Staff Development Council's standards for professional learning. Interview data revealed four themes that administrators believed to comprise effective professional development practice. The themes were interactive learning experiences, needs-based content, practical application of content, and follow-up and on-going practices. The quantitative data suggest that the participating administrators believe their professional development practices support the notion that professional development is seen as a key component to continuous improvement on their campus and is an integral part of their campus culture. The participants' beliefs about their practices were high when related to the professional development standard of leadership and were lowest when related to the evaluation standard.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know