EXAMINING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND MOTIVATION USING INTERNET-BASED INQUIRY IN THE CLASSROOM
2011
- 6,916Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6,916
- Downloads6,275
- 6,275
- Abstract Views641
Article Description
The purpose of the pilot study was to compare middle school Family and Consumer Science student achievement and motivation in a classroom using Internet based inquiry to the achievement and motivation of students without the use of Internet based inquiry. The control group had 37 students and the experimental group had 21 students participate in the study. Each group was taught a two-week lesson on child growth and development. The control group was taught with a conventional, teacher-directed, method using textbooks and worksheets. The experimental group was taught with computers and an Internet based inquiry method. Students in each group were given the same pre-test and post-test to compare achievement. Students and teachers completed a survey to give perceptions of the level of motivation with the teaching strategy they experienced. Questions used words students would understand related to motivation.Student achievement increased in both groups as indicated by higher post-test scores. The control group increased their achievement significantly based on a pairwise comparison. The experimental group increased their achievement but this was not statistically significant. Results of the teacher survey found that teachers felt students learned the content being taught regardless of teaching method and they perceived that student engagement was affected by the teaching method used. The student survey findings showed a significant difference between the control groups and the experimental group in their engagement of learning and preference of learning modality based on a t-test.Because it appears students may be motivated by technology, perhaps teachers may find it useful in the classroom. It is a tool that could help teachers plan lessons that are interactive, current, relevant and real, and therefore, may be motivating to students. If students are motivated and focused on the lessons, then their opportunity for learning and achievement may increase.Adviser: Julie M. Johnson
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know