Insects as Teaching Tools
2012
- 581Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage581
- Downloads504
- Abstract Views77
Article Description
In this talk I will present on projects in which insects were used as instructional tools. This presentation will give an overview of how insects can be used for teaching with a variety of student age groups and how inquiry instruction can be promoted with insects. I will present overviews of 3 projects including Bumble Boosters, Bugs in the Classroom, and Web‐based insects identification tools. Bumble Boosters created a community of researchers that studied bumble distribution and abundance and artificial nesting domicile preferences. Forty Nebraska high schools were involved in this project.Bumble Boosters’ teaching objectives were to raise public awareness of the environmental importance of pollinators, enhance students’ understanding of scientific investigations, increase student’s knowledge of insect biology and pollination ecology, and to engage students in networking with other students to solve a shared problem.Bugs in the Classroom ‐ Bugs in the classroom was a professional development initiative with the goal of empowering teachers to use insects in science inquiry instruction in elementary classrooms. This initiative included workshops for elementary educators on science inquiry and teaching with insects. This talk includes a description of the workshop as well as an evaluation of the impact of the workshop on participating teachers' knowledge of scientific inquiry, entomology knowledge, and inquiry practice.Web‐based Insect Identification Tools ‐ The purpose of this study was to determine whether undergraduate students receiving web‐based instruction based on traditional, key character, or classification instruction differed in their performance of insect identification tasks. Results of this study support that short web‐based insect identification exercises can improve insect identification performance.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know