A decade of catching spies: The United States Army's Counter Intelligence Corps, 1943–1953
Page: 1-257
2001
- 1,216Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,216
- Abstract Views1,216
- 1,216
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The United States Army formed a small unit of investigators, a Corps of Intelligence Police comprised mainly of junior enlisted soldiers with investigative talents and fluency in a foreign language, to protect United States forces overseas and at home from foreign intelligence spies during World War I. Maintained as a mere skeleton force during the interwar years, it was redesignated as the Counter Intelligence Corps (CIC) during the Second World War, and made responsible for counterespionage, countersubversion, and conducting security background checks on military and civilians associated with the Army. When the Allied forces landed in Africa in 1943, CIC agents fought with tactical forces all the way into Germany. After the war was over, CIC became the prime investigative agency for the Army during Occupation duties. Beginning with the Free Territory of Trieste, agents prevented foreign countries, particularly the Soviet Union and its satellite countries in Eastern Europe, from gaining important order of battle information on American forces. During the Occupation of Austria and Germany CIC eliminated the last vestiges of Nazism, assisted Military Government in finding and interrogating suspected war criminals, and investigated spy rings and black marketing activities. The increasing Cold War efforts by the Soviet Union led to one of CIC's largest investigations, Project Snatch-Counter Snatch, where Army agents identified and arrested Soviet agents and operatives involved in black market activities and several kidnappings. In China, CIC limited its normal counterintelligence efforts and acted as advisers to the Nationalist Government, but left the country in 1949 when Communist victory in China's civil war became obvious. In Japan and Korea, CIC developed an extensive political reporting mission and also collected positive intelligence—two missions normally outside the counterintelligence field. With the outbreak of war again in 1950, CIC ceased its peacetime Occupation missions, but reverted back to its World War II spy catching efforts in the Korean War.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know