COMMUNITY DREAMING IN THE RURAL NORTHWEST THE MONTANA STUDY, 1944-47
1999
- 403Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage403
- Downloads310
- Abstract Views93
Article Description
On 28 April 1944, three intellectuals, each representing the views of different regions of the country, met in Chicago and laid the basis for an experimental program in adult education and community outreach. Ernest Melby, the newly appointed chancellor of the University of Montana system of higher education, Baker Brownell, a respected Northwestern University philosophy professor and leading advocate of the small community, and David Stevens, head of the Humanities Division of the Rockefeller Foundation agreed on the shape of a community action project that would later be called the Montana Study. They brought together the concerns and needs of the rural West, Midwest, and East, respectively, and reached consensus on the leading threats to and weaknesses of modern mass society. Melby voiced the West's ambivalence over rapid wartime growth. He noted that cities expanded haphazardly, while rural areas seemed to wither. Brownell brought a midwesterner's desire for stability and continuity of small communities and their presumed inherent cultural worth. Stevens contributed the initial funding, plus a sense of urgency about Americans' ignorance of their own cultural identity-its people and regions-and their attendant lack of understanding about the geopolitical realities of the larger world. But beyond regionalism, and above all, they believed that small communities and local social awareness were the wellsprings of the American character and its democratic culture. The Montana Study represented a propitious joining of the ideas of communitarian reformers with the entreaties of western ruralists who argued that their region had rapidly come of age, but was threatened by the very elements of progress that hastened its maturation.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know