USDA Nutrient Data Set for Retail Beef Cuts
2011
- 260Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage260
- Downloads175
- Abstract Views85
Article Description
Purpose This data set provides retailers with a tool to find the most accurate beef nutrient data for the purpose of on-pack nutrition labeling. This data set focuses on the beef cuts identified by the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) for nutrition labeling and, in addition, some new Beef Value Cuts.IntroductionSince 1990’s, nutrient composition data for beef products in the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (SR) have been updated regularly. These updates have been important since changes in animal husbandry practices and industry procedures have led to the availability of leaner cuts, as well as the marketing of cuts not previously available. The USDA Nutrient Data Laboratory (NDL) has been involved in three different studies designed to update or expand the data on beef cuts in SR. These studies included the 1/8 Inch Study, the Beef Value Cuts (BVC) Study, and the Beef Nutrient Database Improvement Study.. In addition to providing current and accurate estimates for the beef data in SR, these new data are also useful for the industry to meet the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) proposed labeling regulations for fresh, single-ingredient meats.The 1/8 Inch Study was a collaborative research project conducted by USDA NDL, Texas A&M University, and sponsored by the National Cattleman’s Beef Association (NCBA) with support from the the Beef Checkoff Program. The objective of this study was to determine the physical characteristics and nutrient composition of 13 raw and cooked retail cuts that had been fabricated with fat trim levels representative of current retail cuts. This study generated analytical data that had not previously been available in SR.The purpose of the BVC Study was to provide information on a new line of single muscle roasts and steaks, fabricated from the outside round, the knuckle, and the chuck shoulder clod. These cuts, introduced into the retail market in 2001-2002, include the top blade steak (Infraspinatus), shoulder top and center steaks (Triceps brachii), shoulder tender (Teres major), tip center (Rectus femoris), tip side (Vastus lateralis) and bottom round (Biceps femoris). USDA’s NDL, in collaboration with NCBA, with support from the Beef Checkoff Program and the University of Wisconsin conducted this study to determine the nutrient profile of the BVC for inclusion in SR. Since there is no separable fat present in the denuded single muscles of the BVC study, nutrient values for “Separable Lean Only” and “Separable Lean and Fat” are the same. Five of these six major cuts met the USDA definition of lean1.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know