Landmark optimization using local curvature for point-based nonlinear rodent brain image registration
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, ISSN: 1687-4188, Vol: 2012, Page: 635207
2012
- 11Citations
- 144Usage
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef1
- Usage144
- Downloads142
- Abstract Views2
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
Purpose. To develop a technique to automate landmark selection for point-based interpolating transformations for nonlinear medical image registration. Materials and Methods. Interpolating transformations were calculated from homologous point landmarks on the source (image to be transformed) and target (reference image). Point landmarks are placed at regular intervals on contours of anatomical features, and their positions are optimized along the contour surface by a function composed of curvature similarity and displacements of the homologous landmarks. The method was evaluated in two cases (n = 5 each). In one, MRI was registered to histological sections; in the second, geometric distortions in EPI MRI were corrected. Normalized mutual information and target registration error were calculated to compare the registration accuracy of the automatically and manually generated landmarks. Results. Statistical analyses demonstrated significant improvement (P < 0.05) in registration accuracy by landmark optimization in most data sets and trends towards improvement (P < 0.1) in others as compared to manual landmark selection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=81555225324&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/635207; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966289; http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijbi/2012/635207/; https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/com_xray_articles/7; https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=com_xray_articles; https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/635207; https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijbi/2012/635207/; https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijbi/2012/635207.pdf
Hindawi Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know