Analysis of the Quasigroup Block Cipher
2014
- 2Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
Interview Description
In this research we focus on the analysis of the Quasigroup Block Cipher co-developed by Dr. Parakh and Mr. Battey. Cryptographic routines are continually subjected to attacks from those who wish to gain unauthorized access to protected information. Thus as one cryptographic system is retired, others must be devised to take its place. The Quasigroup Block Cipher (QGBC, which is based on Latin squares i.e. Sudoku) has proven to be statistically sound when evaluated by industry standard tools provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Hence, a second proving of the cryptographic system is necessary. In this research project we subject the QGBC to linear and algebraic analysis to determine its strengths and weaknesses. From our findings we propose alternate solutions to enhance the security of the cryptographic algorithm, and demonstrate possible attacks.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know