COMPARING INDIVIDUAL PERCEPTIONS OF FOOD DESERT WITH QUANTITATIVE MEASURES IN OMAHA, NEBRASKA.
2020
- 254Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage254
- Abstract Views150
- Downloads104
Interview Description
Food deserts have been linked to an increase in chronic diseases such as obesity and diabetes, due to lower access to affordable and healthy foods. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) outlines various methods and variables for defining food deserts, in attempts to standardize what constitutes a food desert or their characteristics. The USDA identifies the state of Nebraska as having both rural and urban food deserts, with an increase of food insecurity from 1.1% – 3.0% between 2007 and 2012 and warns of further increase of food deserts and its impact if measures are not taken. However, there is little literature that assesses people’s perception of access to healthy food. In this study, structured questionnaires were used to collect data to appraise individual knowledge, situation, and perception about food deserts. Overlay methods in a Geographic Information System (GIS) and statistical methods were used to analyze and establish associations between individual perception and the USDA’s quantitative measure of food deserts. Kappa test showed little agreement ( = -0.043) between the perception outcomes and their USDA identified food deserts. Chi-square test found an association between perception outcome and race, household income, education, quality of food available in the grocers, and respondents who cited best prices and closer distance to grocers. A logistic regression model showed individuals with bachelor level education are likely to live in a non-food desert neighborhood.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know