Reactions to selection processes involving diversity statements
2020
- 104Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage104
- Abstract Views104
Poster Description
Research examining diversity and employee selection has focused on methods of recruiting minority candidates (e.g., Avery et al., 2013). However, environments for which diverse candidates are selected may not foster inclusion, resulting in turnover (McCay et al., 2007). Although organizations could recruit employees who value diversity and inclusion, the consequences of doing so are unknown.We examined perceptions of job ads requesting a statement that describes how applicants would contribute to diversity (vs. teamwork). We also examined whether individuals higher in other-group orientation would view the request for a diversity statement more positively, as other-group orientation has been associated with organizational attractiveness in diversity-oriented marketing materials (Avery et al., 2013).Black and White participants (N=209; 53.3% Black/African American, 53.6% female), were recruited through Prolific Academic. Participants’ responses to an open-ended question asking them to describe their impressions of the job ad were coded for valence by three trained coders (α=.93).The results indicated that Black participants and White participants who were higher (vs. lower) in other-group orientation perceived the job ad requesting a diversity statement more positively than an ad requesting a teamwork statement. Thus, Blacks and people higher in other-group orientation may be more open to working in a diverse and inclusive organization.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know