Similarity and cluster analysis of time series data using R*-trees.
2005
- 61Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage61
- Downloads53
- Abstract Views8
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Two important issues related to time series data are similarity analysis and cluster analysis. There are two different, but related issues. Regarding to similarity analysis, although R*-Tree based method is most promising, its performance suffers from the socalled "dimensionality curse" and thus dimensionality reduction is needed for it to function efficiently. In this thesis, we use PCA as a dimensionality reduction method in similarity analysis of time series. A similarity tool is developed with dimensionality reduction modules PCA, DFT and PAA included. Compared with DFT and PAA, PCA demonstrates better distance conservation property after dimensionality reduction, cheaper query time and post-processing time, and less false positives for both exact queries and similar queries. Furthermore based on its feature of indexing MBBs according to spatial proximity, we extend R*-Tree's application to cluster analysis. With the aid of R *-Tree indexing, we propose two clustering methods, KMeans-R and Hierarchy-R, as an improved version of K-Means and Hierarchical Clustering, respectively. The performance of two clustering methods is compared against K-Means and K-Means with sampling technique (KMeans-S). We utilize Rand Index (RI), Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) and Information Gain (IG) as the measure of clustering quality to evaluate the four clustering methods. Compared with K-Means and KMeans-S, the clustering results show that KMeans-R and Hierarchy-R can achieve better clustering quality.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know