A topology on the fundamental group.
1972
- 26Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage26
- Downloads23
- Abstract Views3
Thesis / Dissertation Description
For an arbitrary topological space algebraic topology prescribes a construction for a fundamental group. There is a natural way of imposing a topology on this set. We will examine this construction and the topological space which results. We use the following notation and definitions: 1. I f X and Y are topological spaces and ACX, BCY and if f:X+Y is a map, we write f: (X,A)➔(Y,B) if f(A)cB. 2. (Y,B)CX,A)={f: (X,A)+(Y,B)I f is continuous}. 3. 1=[0,1], the closed unit interval; i={O,l}, the points O and 1. 4. If X is a topological space and a£X, then R is an equivalence relation on (X,a) ( I ,I ) defined as follows: If f,gE(X,a)(I, i ) then fRg if and only if f and_ g are homotopic relative to I, written f��g rel I. That is, there exists a continuous function F: I xl+X such that F(O,t)= f(t), F(l,t)=g(t), F(x,O)=a, F(x,l)=a for all x,tsl. R is easily shown to be an equivalence relation, [2, p. 6]. We write Rf��{g£(X,a)(I,I )I gRf}. 5. When we speak of a topology on (Y,B) (X,A) we use the "compact-open" topology. The compact-open topology has subbasic sets of the form (C,U) where CCX i�� compact, UC"f is open, and (C,U)��{fE(Y,_B)(X, A) I f(C)cU} . 6. Q(X,a)=(X,a) (I ,I ) with the compact-open topology is called the loop space of X at a.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know