Administrator and Teacher Perceptions of the Inclusion of Students with Learning Disabilities in Regular Education Classrooms in Nebraska
1998
- 71Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage71
- Downloads69
- Abstract Views2
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study investigates the perceptions of principals, and regular and special education teachers working in public elementary schools in Nebraska relative to the inclusion of students with learning disabilities in regular education classrooms. An Inclusion Perceptions Survey, developed for this research, was mailed to 50 principals, 75 special educators, and 546 regular educators, a randomly selected sample representing approximately 5% of the Nebraska populations of these professional groups. The overall response rate was 47%, yielding 318 surveys for analysis. Results demonstrated statistically significant differences in the perceptions of principals and regular educators and of special educators and regular educators with regard to the effectiveness of and supports for current inclusive practices, and, to a lesser degree, for ideal practices. Principals and special educators tended to be more positive about both the effectiveness of inclusion and the supports and resources provided to the regular teacher with learning disabled students included in his/her classroom. There were also statistically significant differences in the perceptions of respondents from rural vs. urban settings, those with dual or special education vs. regular education endorsements, and those with over 20 years of teaching experience vs. those with less than 8 years. The 70 survey items were subjected to factor analyses which yielded two factors for variables dealing with current inclusion practices and two for variables dealing with ideal practices. Multiple analysis of variance procedures demonstrated that the signficant differences in subpopulations of demographic variables which emerged for survey items were also present for factors. Differences by assignment followed a pattern of correlations with factors similar to its pattern for survey items. Recommendations for cultivating more harmonious perceptions of inclusion among principals, and regular and special educators include the establishment of participatory decision-making, ongoing staff development, and a system of accountability for outcomes for students with learning disabilities.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know