Build on what you have: Developing strategic information literacy through curriculum mapping
Instructional identities and information literacy: Transforming our profession, our institutions, our programs, and ourselves, Vol: 1
2023
- 32Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage32
- Downloads17
- Abstract Views15
Book Chapter Description
College-level research and information literacy instruction is a service that offers seemingly limitless possibilities that are unfortunately often whittled down to the proverbial one-shot session with its brief, surface introduction to library resources. For information literacy instructors interested in providing targeted instruction, curriculum maps are a powerful tool that allow instructors to scaffold information literacy instruction, reduce redundancy, and effectively communicate the complexities and opportunities of information literacy instruction to faculty. In this case study, I share how I used curriculum mapping as part of my work as a library liaison to the Department of Education at Salve Regina University. Creating a curriculum map of my information literacy instruction provided me with a unique opportunity to engage in transformative learning by examining, questioning, and revising my perceptions of myself within my role as an instruction librarian. Through this process, I was able to shape and redefine my instructional identity, moving from a more passive role as an instructor who taught classes when requested to a strategic partner able to communicate and implement a comprehensive vision for scaffolding information literacy skills across the undergraduate education program to enrich student learning.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know