On training programs for design engineers in the use of finite element analysis
Computers & Structures, ISSN: 0045-7949, Vol: 26, Issue: 1, Page: 411-414
1987
- 1Citations
- 1Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
The increasing competitiveness in the industrial environment has been the motivation for deployment of a variety of Mechanical Computer Aided Engineering tools, including finite element procedures. To properly exploit these procedures during the design process requires close coupling of the MCAE tools to the design engineer, with a reasonable strategy placing the analysis responsibility on the design engineering staff. The design engineering function has, however, been primarily project directed, and the experience gained during design engineering does not lend itself well to effectively performing the analysis function. This paper addresses possible approaches that can be used to train design engineers in the use of finite element technology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0045794987902665; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(87)90266-5; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0023249231&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0045794987902665; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:0045794987902665?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:0045794987902665?httpAccept=text/plain; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mcise_facpubs/682; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1681&context=mcise_facpubs; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949%2887%2990266-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949%2887%2990266-5
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know