Predicting maximum lake depth from surrounding topography
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 6, Issue: 9, Page: e25764
2011
- 51Citations
- 86Usage
- 87Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations51
- Citation Indexes46
- 46
- CrossRef19
- Policy Citations5
- Policy Citation5
- Usage86
- Downloads78
- Abstract Views8
- Captures87
- Readers87
- 87
Article Description
Information about lake morphometry (e.g., depth, volume, size, etc.) aids understanding of the physical and ecological dynamics of lakes, yet is often not readily available. The data needed to calculate measures of lake morphometry, particularly lake depth, are usually collected on a lake-by-lake basis and are difficult to obtain across broad regions. To span the gap between studies of individual lakes where detailed data exist and regional studies where access to useful data on lake depth is unavailable, we developed a method to predict maximum lake depth from the slope of the topography surrounding a lake. We use the National Elevation Dataset and the National Hydrography Dataset - Plus to estimate the percent slope of surrounding lakes and use this information to predict maximum lake depth. We also use field measured maximum lake depths from the US EPA's National Lakes Assessment to empirically adjust and cross-validate our predictions. We were able to predict maximum depth for ~28,000 lakes in the Northeastern United States with an average cross-validated RMSE of 5.95 m and 5.09 m and average correlation of 0.82 and 0.69 for Hydrological Unit Code Regions 01 and 02, respectively. The depth predictions and the scripts are openly available as supplements to this manuscript.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0025764; 10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80053599516&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21984945; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g002; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/87; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1094&context=nrs_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025764; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025764&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025764; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025764; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025764&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025764
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know