Availability and Accuracy of Information Regarding Nonprescription Emergency Contraception
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, ISSN: 1531-1937, Vol: 29, Issue: 5, Page: 454-460
2016
- 12Citations
- 1Usage
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- CrossRef12
- 10
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
Background: Although access to emergency contraception (EC) has increased with nonprescription status and approval of Plan B One-Step without age restrictions, barriers may still remain in patient education. This study assesses product availability and accuracy of information for EC among community pharmacies in Rhode Island, comparing changes from 2009 to 2012. Methods: Two female investigators posing as patients seeking EC followed a standardized script over telephone conversations. Investigators assessed EC availability, product use information, and cost at all community (retail) pharmacies in Rhode Island. Data were reported as group results with no identifiers. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to analyze results. Results: During spring of 2009 and 2012, 165 and 171 pharmacies were telephoned, respectively. Approximately 90% of pharmacies stocked EC both years. In all, 62% versus 28% (P <.001) indicated EC should be taken as soon as possible; 82.5% versus 87.7% (P =.220) provided correct administration information; 67% versus 84% (P <.001) warned about adverse effects; and 67% versus 53% (P =.123) provided the correct minimum age for purchase. Conclusions: Access to nonprescription EC in Rhode Island is very good. Sites not stocking EC should reassess plans for patients to obtain medication. There is need for reeducation on EC labeling to improve counseling provided over the telephone.
Bibliographic Details
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/php_facpubs/1695; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/php_facpubs/1283; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/php_facpubs/1473; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/php_facpubs/1521
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988531218&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0897190014568378; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25637393; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0897190014568378; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/php_facpubs/1695; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2702&context=php_facpubs; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/php_facpubs/1283; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2290&context=php_facpubs; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/php_facpubs/1473; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2480&context=php_facpubs; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/php_facpubs/1521; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2528&context=php_facpubs; http://jpp.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/01/29/0897190014568378; http://jpp.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/01/29/0897190014568378.abstract; http://jpp.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/01/29/0897190014568378.full; http://jpp.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/01/29/0897190014568378.full.pdf; http://jpp.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1177/0897190014568378; http://jpp.sagepub.com/content/29/5/454.abstract; http://jpp.sagepub.com/content/29/5/454.full; http://jpp.sagepub.com/content/29/5/454.full.pdf; http://jpp.sagepub.com/content/29/5/454; http://jpp.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0897190014568378
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know