Applying the Concepts Understanding by Design to a World War I History Course
2015
- 58Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage58
- Abstract Views55
- Downloads3
Artifact Description
In this project, I apply the concept of Understanding by Design as outlined by Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins in order to create a World War I history course. In doing so I’ve attempted to deepen student understanding by having them make meaning of learning via "big ideas" while tying in important historiographical concepts and approaches. The course will focus on essential questions that include: "Why do countries go to war?" "What is the role of the historian?" "What drives large groups to support a cause?” “How does changing technology affect peoples’ lives?” “What are the unforeseen effects of war?” and “How does the past influence the future?” McTighe and Wiggins state, "Instruction is often focused on superficial coverage of lots of content as specified by national, state, or provincial standards, or as contained in distended textbooks with an emphasis on short-term content acquisition for simple recall rather than long-term understanding." Through this project, I'd like to challenge this trend. I seek to cultivate my instructional skills in order to be a "coach of understanding" rather than simply a purveyor of content. In doing so, I have attempted to create lesson plans and activities that are both aligned and meaningful. As the course progresses students, the goal is for students to answer the original essential questions with more depth and be able to transfer material to primary source documents, film, literature, and other areas of learning.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know