Can Health Outcomes and Inequalities be Improved While Containing Costs? The Role of Voluntary Health Insurance in Universal Health Care Systems in the OECD
2023
- 309Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage309
- Downloads155
- Abstract Views154
Paper Description
While European countries have improved health outcomes through universal healthcare systems (UHC), they also face pressures to contain the high cost of these systems. In order to control expenses, governments have reduced services covered under UHC and increased co-payments. Voluntary health insurance (VHI) can help cover gaps in publicly financed health coverage, but this is not affordable for all. Since people with higher socioeconomic status are more likely to have VHI and medical providers are incentivized to prioritize people with VHI, VHI tends to exacerbate inequalities in access to health care. Similarly, high out-of-pocket costs worsen healthcare. This research focuses on the relationship between VHI and health outcomes for both men and women in UHC systems within the OECD. Qualitative analysis of healthcare systems in Latvia, Poland, Sweden, and the Netherlands shows that countries with higher rates of participation in voluntary private insurance experience higher gender inequality in health outcomes than those with lower rates of participation. Empirical analysis of the effect of voluntary health insurance on differences in infectious disease rates and non-communicable disease rates by gender, and maternal mortality throughout the OECD shows no clear significant relationship between health outcomes and VHI. Findings from this research suggest that health outcomes and inequalities can be improved by reducing reliance on out-of-pocket costs and addressing socioeconomic inequalities, including gender inequality, through greater public coverage.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know