Shared-Use Bus Priority Lanes on City Streets: Approaches to Access and Enforcement
Journal of Public Transportation, ISSN: 1077-291X, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 25-41
2013
- 16Citations
- 2,236Usage
- 49Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef2
- Usage2,236
- Downloads1,370
- Abstract Views866
- Captures49
- Readers49
- 49
Article Description
This paper examines policies and strategies governing the operations of bus lanes in major congested urban centers where the bus lanes do not completely exclude other uses. The two key questions addressed are: 1. What is the scope of the priority use granted to buses? When is bus priority in effect, and what other users may share the lanes during these times? 2. How are the lanes enforced? To answer these questions, the study developed detailed cases on management strategies in seven cities that currently have shared-use bus priority lanes: Los Angeles, London, New York City, Paris, San Francisco, Seoul, and Sydney. Through the case studies, the paper examines the range of practices in use and highlights innovative ones that may contribute to bus lane success.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22017581; http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.16.4.2; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84890949692&origin=inward; http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jpt/vol16/iss4/2/; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/jpt/vol16/iss4/2; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=jpt; https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jpt/vol16/iss4/2; https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=jpt; https://dx.doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.16.4.2; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/jpt/vol16/iss4/2/
University of South Florida Libraries
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know