A Bimodal Distribution of Two Distinct Categories of Intrinsically Disordered Structures with Separate Functions in FG Nucleoporins *
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, ISSN: 1535-9476, Vol: 9, Issue: 10, Page: 2205-2224
2010
- 256Citations
- 34Usage
- 272Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations256
- Citation Indexes256
- 256
- CrossRef228
- Usage34
- Downloads34
- Captures272
- Readers272
- 272
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Visualizing the disordered nuclear transport machinery in situ
Nature, Published online: 26 April 2023; doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05990-0 Previously shown as a 60-nm hole in the nuclear pore complex, the transport machinery by FG-nucleoporins is mapped.
Article Description
Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) gate the only conduits for nucleocytoplasmic transport in eukaryotes. Their gate is formed by nucleoporins containing large intrinsically disordered domains with multiple phenylalanine-glycine repeats (FG domains). In combination, these are hypothesized to form a structurally and chemically homogeneous network of random coils at the NPC center, which sorts macromolecules by size and hydrophobicity. Instead, we found that FG domains are structurally and chemically heterogeneous. They adopt distinct categories of intrinsically disordered structures in non-random distributions. Some adopt globular, collapsed coil configurations and are characterized by a low charge content. Others are highly charged and adopt more dynamic, extended coil conformations. Interestingly, several FG nucleoporins feature both types of structures in a bimodal distribution along their polypeptide chain. This distribution functionally correlates with the attractive or repulsive character of their interactions with collapsed coil FG domains displaying cohesion toward one another and extended coil FG domains displaying repulsion. Topologically, these bipartite FG domains may resemble sticky molten globules connected to the tip of relaxed or extended coils. Within the NPC, the crowding of FG nucleoporins and the segregation of their disordered structures based on their topology, dimensions, and cohesive character could force the FG domains to form a tubular gate structure or transporter at the NPC center featuring two separate zones of traffic with distinct physicochemical properties.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535947620345242; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m000035-mcp201; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77954615134&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20368288; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1535947620345242; http://www.mcponline.org/lookup/doi/10.1074/mcp.M000035-MCP201; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1074/mcp.M000035-MCP201; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/mme_facpub/472; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1527&context=mme_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m000035-mcp201; https://www.mcponline.org/content/9/10/2205; https://www.mcponline.org/content/9/10/2205.abstract; https://www.mcponline.org/content/mcprot/9/10/2205.full.pdf; http://www.mcponline.org/content/9/10/2205; http://www.mcponline.org/content/9/10/2205.abstract; http://www.mcponline.org/content/9/10/2205.full.pdf; http://www.mcponline.org/cgi/doi/10.1074/mcp.M000035-MCP201
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know