Ten myths concerning ecosystem approaches to marine resource management
Marine Policy, ISSN: 0308-597X, Vol: 31, Issue: 6, Page: 681-690
2007
- 206Citations
- 2Usage
- 412Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations206
- Citation Indexes180
- 180
- CrossRef149
- Policy Citations26
- Policy Citation26
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures412
- Readers412
- 412
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Evaluation of the framework for national marine environmental policies in Cuba [PDF]
FastTrack ➲ publication Bull Mar Sci. 94(0):000–000. 2018 research paper https://doi.org/10.5343/ An evaluation of the framework for national marine environmental policies in Cuba 1 1
Article Description
Ecosystem approaches to marine resource management (EAM) offer comprehensive decision making based on rationalization of currently fragmented ocean policies and their implementation. However, despite the apparent utility in addressing these problems, EAM has also been criticized as being nonspecific, immature, invalid as a basis for decision making, and not fully supported by science. While it is commonly perceived that a paradigm shift in governance and science institutions awaits implementation to address these criticisms, in fact, ecosystem considerations are being incorporated more frequently, employing existing authorities as the basis for mitigation of sectoral impacts and for resource allocation. Management ‘best practices’ for EAM are emerging based on these experiences. Ten common criticisms of EAM, which I believe to be myths propagated primarily to maintain the status quo among sectoral interests, are discussed. Accelerated evolution of EAM will occur as science better articulates feedbacks, cumulative ecological effects and economic consequences framing policy choices, and more formal “rules of engagement” among sectors (e.g., fishing, coastal development, water quality, and energy) are negotiated. These operating procedures would be established under informal arrangements, in national law, and by international agreement. The management paradigm for marine resources is shifting and EAM will eventually be considered redundant with established practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X07000292; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.03.011; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34547656286&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308597X07000292; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/msc_facpub/2174; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3136&context=msc_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.03.011
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know