Truth and lie in visual literacy 2021
Journal of Visual Literacy, ISSN: 2379-6529, Vol: 40, Issue: 2, Page: 91-93
2021
- 1Citations
- 20Usage
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Usage20
- Abstract Views20
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Article Description
Today’s students were born into an image-saturated social media environment, and their literacy practices are mediated visually, including by photo and video creation, and sharing, video chatting, and the visual language of emoticons, GIFs and emojis. Research has found that teaching visually helps develop students’ creativity and thus opens new learning possibilities. Images also enhance memory, which benefits the learning process. Image-based learning helps in expressing thoughts and opinions, which are often provoked or inspired by visual clues. And yet, with all this progress, we have little knowledge of the role of visual literacy educators in teaching students to recognise visual lies and truth in the classroom. More specifically, what theories, technical tools and instructions tell us about image manipulation?This special edition will explore the emerging visual literacy of truth and lies across three major questions: Can a theoretical survey examining students' comprehension of text and visual narrative reveal false beliefs? How can we support our students to investigate visual cultural and historical objects? And how Photoshop tools help build awareness of image manipulation in the classroom.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108817752&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1051144x.2021.1902196; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902196; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902196; https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/si_facpub/622; https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1624&context=si_facpub; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/si_facpub/622; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1624&context=si_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1051144x.2021.1902196
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know