Wolves for Yellowstone: Dynamics in time and space
Journal of Mammalogy, ISSN: 1545-1542, Vol: 99, Issue: 5, Page: 1021-1031
2018
- 54Citations
- 42Usage
- 318Captures
- 10Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations54
- Citation Indexes46
- 46
- CrossRef12
- Policy Citations8
- Policy Citation8
- Usage42
- Abstract Views42
- Captures318
- Readers318
- 318
- Mentions10
- News Mentions10
- News10
Most Recent News
In Search of Leverage: Which Climate Actions Do Really Matter?
Photo by Michael LaRosa on Unsplash You’re reading an introduction to the fledgling publication In Search of Leverage , a growing collection of articles exploring
Article Description
The reintroduction of gray wolves (Canis lupus) to Yellowstone National Park is the most celebrated ecological experiment in history. As predicted by population models, the rapid recovery of a wolf population caused both temporal and spatial variability in wolf-ungulate interactions that likewise generated temporal and spatial variation in the expression of trophic cascades. This has amplified spatial variation in vegetation in Yellowstone, particularly with willow (Salix spp.) and cottonwood (Populus spp.) in riparian areas, with associated changes in food webs. Increasing influences of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), cougars (Puma concolor), and bison (Bison bison) are making what initially was predominantly an elk-wolf interaction into an increasingly complex system. Outside Yellowstone, however, humans have a dominant influence in western North America that overwhelms trophic cascades resulting in what appear to be bottom-up influences on community structure and function. Complex and unexpected ecosystem responses to wolf recovery in Yellowstone reinforce the value of national parks and other protected areas as ecological baseline reserves.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055035827&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyy115; https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/99/5/1021/5107035; http://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article-pdf/99/5/1021/25992281/gyy115.pdf; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/aspen_bib/7772; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8783&context=aspen_bib; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyy115; https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article-abstract/99/5/1021/5107035?redirectedFrom=fulltext; https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article-pdf/99/5/1021/25992281/gyy115.pdf
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know