Landscape structure influences browsing on a keystone tree species in conservation areas
Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN: 0378-1127, Vol: 457, Page: 117724
2020
- 9Citations
- 19Usage
- 39Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef6
- Usage19
- Abstract Views19
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Article Description
Aspen is a keystone species in boreal forests. The future of aspen in many conservation areas is threatened by ungulate browsing. Our aim was to study the effect of browsing on aspen regeneration and population structure in conservation areas in Central Finland, and the effect of surrounding landscape structure on browsing. Aspen density varied greatly among and within conservation areas. In about half of the conservation areas, middle-sized aspens were scarce or missing, which indicates heavy browsing in the recent past. In addition, the number of dead, large aspens in advanced decay stages were rare. Browsing pressure varied greatly among the areas, but on average, a bit more than half of the living aspens had been browsed. Landscape structure influenced browsing so that increasing proportion of farmland within 1 km and 3 km of the conservation areas decreased browsing pressure. The poor recruitment of aspen in many conservation areas jeopardizes the accumulation of large living and dead aspens. This means that many aspen-associated threatened species are in the risk of local extinction, unless aspen recruitment is enhanced by management.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112719314276; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117724; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076031373&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378112719314276; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/aspen_bib/7870; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8875&context=aspen_bib; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/aspen_bib/7865; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8866&context=aspen_bib; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117724
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know