Advances in the SLIM Lunar Spectral Irradiance Model; Many Observations, One Moon
2021
- 283Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage283
- Downloads149
- Abstract Views134
Artifact Description
Work on the Spacecraft and Earth-based Lunar Irradiance Model (SLIM) system has concentrated on the SLIMED model (pronounced as if you lost weight), which uses a weighted least-squares fit to many instrument data sets and is continuous in all dimensions. Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) and Solar Spectral Irradiance (SSI) variations are now included. A libration correction to the observations based on integration of reflectance maps made by Lunar orbiters can be included. Current fits involve 2 observatory sets (ROLO and NIST:Cramer) and 8 LEO instruments (SeaWiFS, L8-OLI, Hyperion, Terra and Aqua MODIS, SNPP-VIIRS, PLEIADES A and B) for a total of 99,000 points with mean-absolute-residual of 0.6% . Data from GEO instruments thus far show too much variation in irradiance to be included in the fits.All the above instruments, plus GOES-8,9,10,11,12,14,15, SEVIRI 1 to 4, GOES-16 and 17 ABI (and NOAA20-VIIRS) have been calibrated with a SLIMED model and the average gain bias of each instrument band derived, as well as asymptotic trends and in some cases periodic variations. There is general agreement at the few percent level for some operational instruments yet significant differences between others. The magnitude of differences between instruments suggests that the methodology of extracting lunar irradiance from lunar images is the culprit in many cases. As lunar models improve, more detailed image-processing will be warranted. Understanding the hardware and processing differences between nadir and lunar imaging can require special sequences, preferably planned during commissioning.There is still a lot of work to be done to approach the potential utility of lunar calibration, ppt or better! All spacecraft teams with lunar observations are invited to participate.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know